Independent Journalists: the new faces, though old methods. Who ‘throws dead cats on the table’ today?

Information war has become an integral part of the present-day world. The influence of mass media (in the broad sense of this word) on society is enormous now. The one, who has control over information, is controlling public opinion and makes a significant impact on policymaking circles.

In such authoritarian countries as Iran, Russia, Syria and North Korea political propaganda, which can’t have or involve interpretation of events that differs from official line, is perhaps the only source of information. Our task is to help our readers (including those ones who can receive truthful information only from the Internet) form an objective opinion about what is happening around them in the world. In democratic countries it is normal thought process to have different and even polar points of view.

In recent years, the independent citizen journalists assume increasingly greater importance in presenting detailed picture of reality because they are people who deliver their material from events’ center, who are not involved with conservative corporate policies, editorial line, policy templates and other stereotypes of ‘professionals’. They are independent and have forcibly expressed civic awareness. Their word is realistic outlook on life.

But still we need to perceive the differences between those who work for conveying truthful information to the readers, and those who only grandstand in the quest for fame and high ratings.

Osama Ali Suleiman, head of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), who uses the name of Rami Abdulrahman in his blog posts, is a good example of the second type of ‘citizen journalists’, for his actions bring discredit on all non-indifferent people. With the start of Syrian civil war SOHR became one of the main information sources that focused on civilian casualty figures. But eventually it came out that SOHR was only a one-man show and this man was Suleiman who lived in the UK and confirmed his ‘play-by-play bulletins’ with messages from social networks accounts, whose ownership is rather questionable. Moreover, it became known that Suleiman was engaged in juggling with facts and descended to fake, which threw discredit upon SOHR competence in the quality of the information office.

Eliot Higgins, a former finance worker, is another telling illustration. He specializes in making investigation through using open-source information on the Internet.

Higgins also embarked upon his career during the war in Syria. Despite the fact that all blogger’s beliefs about warfare and weaponry, according to his own statement, were based on video games and blockbusters, Higgins gained the character of weapons expert and made interest with leading media companies. He was the first person who reported that Assad’s regime made use of barrel and cluster bombs as well as chemical weapons against own people.

On 15 July, 2014, exactly two days before (!) the Boing 777 crash near Donetsk, he founded Bellingcat project. The investigation of this catastrophe was the main task of his group there, though it has not been finished up to now. You should direct attention to the fact that the whole time no one in Bellingcat group visited the Boing crash site. However, this fact could not care less either the researchers, or the media, or public institutions that use Bellingcat reports. Meanwhile, many so-called ‘facts’ that experts use to draw their conclusions on are estimated questionable.

For instance, Dutch journalist Max van der Werff found out that Bellingcat used photos of the launch of ADMS Buk missile that was counterfeited. In addition, Bellingcat experts stubbornly ignore statements of the locals that were published, for instance, in The Telegraph or BBC, where it is said that they had not heard or seen anything like surface-to-air missile launch either on the day of the tragedy or ever yet.

There is also doubt in the authenticity of the famous photo of ADMS Buk that was claimed to had been taken in the town of Torez (picture 1). According to some experts in graphics, this graphical proof was created from two different images (picture 2).

Pic. 1

Pic. 2

Bellingcat report shows that, according to the photo, the Buk vehicle’s size is 9 meters (picture 3) but it should be equal to almost 12 meters. Thus, the photo’s creators made a mistake either in the distance to the operator or in the size of the truck together with the Buk (picture 4).

Pic. 3

Pic. 4

In addition to that, detail loss of some places in the image seems rather strange. When you rotate a draft of the truck in the photo, the cabin of the Volvo perfectly fits the front of the Buk vehicle while the image of its back fades, and vice versa (pictures 5, 6, 7).

Pic. 5

Pic. 6

Pic. 7

Furthermore, there are no shadows of the tree in the photo (picture 8) that should be easily visible here (pictures 9, 10).

Pic. 8

Pic. 9

Pic. 10

According to experts, such discrepancies that point at possible deception of images, are on other photo and video evidence represented by Bellingcat group’s researchers.

The two Paris Match photos showing area inside Donetsk city. Paris Match published the first (top) photo on July 25, 2014. The full version of the second photo (bottom) appeared on the Internet in January 2015.

There are a number of areas in these Paris Match photos that suggest they are a product of a photo manipulation software like Photoshop. Take a close look at them (open their higher resolution versions by clicking on Picture 11 if necessary). The first impression is that they look ‘strange’, they look unlike any normal photos or even stills from a low resolution video. Compare the back of the truck’s white cabin with the Buk vehicle (these areas are marked in Picture 12). The back of the cabin looks sharp, as if it was taken from an excellent quality, high resolution source, while Buk looks fuzzy everywhere you look. No effects like motion blur or camera’s low resolution can explain this difference in picture quality. The cabin’s picture quality should be just as bad as Buk’s or Buk’s quality should be as good as cabin’s. You can see this startling difference in picture quality between the Buk vehicle and the truck’s cabin in both photos.

Picture 12. The area marked orange has significant difference in picture quality in comparison to the one marked blue.

There is a night and day difference between the cabin’s edge and Buk’s edge in terms of their sharpness in the first Paris Match photo (Picture 13). Buk’s edge is fuzzy. It almost blends with the background.

Picture 13. A comparison of picture quality of cabin’s edge with Buk’s edge in the first Paris Match photo.

In the first Paris Match photo, it is incredible how you can clearly see the telephone number, how sharp the back of the cabin looks, but how at the same time, you can barely see even the shape of Buk’s wheels on this normal day (Picture 14).

Picture 14. A part of the first Paris Match photo showing the area of Buk’s wheels.

Another area that doesn’t look possible without the use of tools like Photoshop (Picture 15).

Picture 15. A part from the second Paris Match photo.

The reflection from the car’s dashboard is not the same in both photos (Picture 16). The area inside the orange box should have the same black patches that are visible in the second photo.

Picture 16. A comparison of dashboard reflection between the two Paris Match photos.

The full-sized version of the second photo was not published for 6 months, Paris Match initially wrote that the first photo is from Snizhne rather than Donetsk, and the story is suspicious: Someone is driving in Donetsk city on July 17 at around 11:00 on a car. He takes photos of impossible picture quality, showing a part of a car (visible in the first Paris Match photo), truck and Buk, parked almost in the middle of a large city. He then sends these photos exclusively to a French magazine named Paris Match, all while there is not a single other known picture or video material of a Buk vehicle inside Donetsk city made by anybody else since the beginning of the conflict.

Beyond all doubt, so polar opposite conclusions of different groups that use similar methods of analysis cannot allow an honest man to take any one’s side. However, Bellingcat rejects any other interpretations as some kind of conspiracy. So much like the best traditions of authoritarian propaganda.

Another issue is the level of professionalism and Bellingcat experts’ ability to interpret data adequately.

After Bellingcat research group accused Russia of satellite images’ editing at the aim of showing Ukrainian air defense activity in the area of MH17 downing, German image forensics expert and a founder of IRISPIX website Jens Kriese, publicly stated that Bellingcat ‘Error Level Analysis’ (ELA-analysis) gives almost nothing except developing the group’s PR campaign. As to the ELA-analysis’ founder Dr. Neal Krawetz, he considers that Bellingcat experts’ report ‘is nothing more than reading tea leaves’ and a good example of ‘how to not do image analysis’.

Other experts in graphics and meta data have also questioned the authenticity of the Bellingcat group’s evidentiary material.

The bias of activities of ‘independent’ journalists’ group discredits the idea of the very possibility of obtaining reliable information from open sources. You can treat Bellingcat activities in different ways, but it is a thankless task to trust this group’s experts or others like them because at this stage they have no reliable or un-disproved materials.

Our politicians and well-heeled journalists, who take up any ‘roasted information convenient for them; often take the lead from such messengers of likes and on-line viewings as Suleiman and Higgins. And together they form a virtual reality, which is far out.



Lithuania of Dalia Grybauskaite as an example of poor government

Performance of a country’s president is best measured by the living standards of people, and they have fallen sharply in Lithuania of Dalia Grybauskaite over the past several years. The main reason why the Lithuanians have become so poor lies in the short-sighted policy of Mrs. Grybauskaite, whose decisions made as president, at least most part of them, run counter to the interests of the people in that country. Reaction to Russia’s imposing food embargo on the EU countries is an outstanding example of it, since it was the Lithuanian agricultural producers who suffered the most from the ban.

Russia has always been a key market for the Lithuanian agrarians, yet it has been closed by the wish of their president. Mrs. Grybauskaite is aware of the difficulties they are facing, still she stubbornly rejects any dialogue with the Russian Federation, insisting that previous sanctions be kept and new imposed.
Nevertheless, if she sees any instantaneous benefits that don’t threaten her reputation of an unyielding Russophobe, she is eager to talk to Moscow. When the haulage agreement between Poland and Russia expired February this year and thousands of Russia’s trucks had to look for alternative routes to Germany, Mrs. President didn’t hesitate to grant them free access to ferry terminal in Klaipeda and later she even established a separate passage for transporters from Russia. Although such ‘generosity’ increased financial well-being of some companies, it is inconsistent with sharp public remarks towards Russia.
No less odd is the decision of Lithuanian authorities that was pushed through by the president to cut Russian gas import to minimum despite its low cost as compared to alternative supplies. Currently, Norwegian Statoil delivers gas to the Klaipeda LNG terminal at rather volatile prices varying from 16 to 20 Euros per MWh. To that you need to add costs of shipment and maintenance of the terminal. On top of that, when Dalia Grybauskaite decided that an LNG terminal should be build, she expected that Lithuania would become an intermediary between Statoil and other Baltic States, however neither Latvia nor Estonia are in any haste to import LNG from Vilnius, which reduces cost effectiveness of the project as well.
Small wonder, that these dire financial straits force more than 50 thousand people of working age on average to annually leave Lithuania to find work in other EU countries. Generally, they have to be content with the lowest-skilled jobs like plumber, dishwasher, cleaner etc. However in Western Europe even for such labor you can get much higher salary than what you receive in Lithuania at white-collar jobs. Same economic factors determine failing birth rates since people cannot provide for themselves let alone children.
Considering the foregoing, it is clear why of the 1105 migrants from the Middle East Lithuania agreed to take within the course of 2 years only a dozen or so accepted the offer. Although some sources claim that Mrs. Grybauskaite considers the possibility of proposing additional economic benefits for migrants in case Brussels in future expressly supports her every Pan-European initiative.
However president of Lithuania as well as leaders of other post-Soviet states needs to understand that the time has long passed when declarative statements about formal successes and on-paper initiatives were enough to maintain their reputation. Now both people of those countries and their European partners need certain results and tangible achievements, and this is exactly what Dalia Grybauskaite lacks.

Royal Democracy: Will There Be a Referendum on Ukraine’s EU Association Agreement in Sweden?

Recently, the referendum on the EU association agreement with Ukraine was held in the Netherlands. The event has broad resonance among wide sections of the public. A lot of people began to wonder how to support the rising wave of opposition to the EU bureaucratic apparatus. After all, democracy, which is so much talked about out loud in Europe, is the rule of people. Ordinary Europeans do not want to feed up some strangers at their own expense; and the precedent inspires them with new attainments.

The leading European politicians cannot but understand it; and it is also difficult for us to imagine to the full extent what is being done to prevent the Dutch scenario’s recurrence. Alarmed ‘servants of the people’ persist in advancing their interests (or better say Ukraine’s interests). If you take Sweden, then, I wonder, who else but Carl Bildt is interested in the EU integration of collapsing Ukraine? It has already been said a lot about his friendly relations with top politicians and prospects in the Ukrainian political sphere.


Bildt would have something to lose if the Swedes are granted the right of free expression of their will regarding Ukraine. The more as the Rights have already seriously gone into this question.

And a hit has already come: that’s King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden’s 70th birthday. If you examine the lists of invitees, by the way, among them there also was Carl Bildt himself with his wife Anna Maria Corazza Bildt (who is a current member of the European Parliament), you can find a lot of interesting persons there. During Royal Family’ events representatives of the ruling European dynasties and political leaders of the Kingdom regularly meet together. In this format it’s impossible to avoid discussing the latest world developments, and the main Swedish lobbyist of Ukraine’s interests has just taken the occasion. Furthermore, the anniversary’s ceremony was attended by Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands who is close to Swedish Royal Family and used to have great influence on political decision making and has not completely lost this touch yet.

Among Swedish politicians and representatives of the leading Swedish media (heads of Swedish TV and radio broadcasting corporations) as well as the diplomatic representatives of Norway and Finland there was a debate on preventing referendums similar to the Dutch one across Europe. As a result, it was decided to create a new international organization which only aim is to keep ordinary Europeans from influencing the EU policy.


New international organization will maintain the unity of Europe

During the multi-day King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden’s anniversary celebration which was held in early May, high-ranking guests had a number of unceremonious meetings to discuss some international policy issues among other things. In the course of one of these meetings former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sweden Carl Bildt proposed to establish a new organization for counteraction to Eurosceptic sentiments in Europe. The majority of politicians present at the event gave a favorable praise of Mr. Bildt’s initiative. According to the information available, the organization will be named Endowment for United Europe. Its main goal shall be the EU institutions’ strengthening and building joint European States’ stance on external challenges.


Sponsors of Islamists invest into Hillary

As I’ve been keeping watching the election race, I’ve been coming to understanding that Mrs. Clinton is the most admirable as a woman of character and a nimble politician.

This person is out of any legal or moral rules. She should be a hard-boiled egg so that she could manage to gain support of either Jewish tycoons (Rockefeller, Soros), or Muslim zealots (Fetullah Gulen’s followers).

She is so convincing that an obedient herd of voters have been praising her effusively, but taking no notice of unscrupulous actions of the future U.S. President. Also at first glance such citizens’ and non-citizens’ willingness to donate millions of dollars to Clinton’s presidential race resembles sect or mass hypnosis.

It is noteworthy that in spite her vast political experience Hillary is far short of charisma of Joseph Di Mambro or Jim Jones, the leader of the People’s Temple. That is why Americans are save from mass suicides and signing over all their possessions to Mrs. Clinton. However there was a surge among influential organizations and corporations in love for HIV-positive persons, poor and disaster-affected people, as soon as it became known for certain that Clinton once again would run for the presidency. Notably that not only such American organizations as Friends of Saudi Arabia, Monsanto and ExxonMobile, but also foreign citizens occurred to be among such soft-hearted givers.

According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2014 among those who made donations to the Clinton Foundation were United Arab Emirates, a first-time donor, Qatari government committee preparing for the 2022 soccer World Cup, Oman, Canadian government agency and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is a remarkable list. Thus, it is known that the State Department issued rather unfavourable human rights reports about the UAE and Oman. Qatar was also black-booked by the human rights activists because of over 1,000 migrant workers have already died during the 2022 World Cup preparations. The forgoing Canadian agency has been promoting the Keystone XL pipeline’s construction in spite of environmentalists’ and some Congressmen’s harsh attacks.

With regard to Saudi Arabia, this country has been a repeat donor since the foundation’s founding. Also it has a long history of cooperation with Hillary Clinton. It’s no coincidence that George W. Bush calls her ‘his sister-in-law’.


According to a report published in the Intercept, Clinton made weapons transfers to Saudi Arabia a “top priority”.

In released by the State Department emails concerned the recent scandal Hillary celebrates heartily ‘not a bad Christmas present’. The present had occurred to be the sale of over 80 Boeing manufactured (another one of the most generous sponsors of the Clintons Foundation) F-15 jets. Those very fighters Saudis used during airstrikes in Yemen, when they hit facilities of Doctors Without Borders, a wedding hall, a center for the blind, and also killed journalists and ambulance drivers.


In 2012 the Saudi king expressed his satisfactions with such effective cooperation by a half a million dollars gift. This price is beyond the reach of reason and good manners (the majority of gifts from foreign establishment have been assessed at $ 450-650). However, they didn’t forget to make a “Non-acceptance would cause embarrassment to donor and U.S. Government” note.


Upon the whole during Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, the State Department granted increases in arms exports to 17 out of 20 countries sponsoring the Clintons Foundation. Difference for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia totaled 97%, Qatar – 1482%, Oman – 221%, the UAE – 1005%.

An Algerian case is an illustrative sample of this tried and tested simple scheme. In 2010 Clinton criticized Algeria for violations of democratic freedoms and corruption in the country. In the same year the Algerian government donated $ 500,000 to the Clintons Foundation ‘assist with earthquake relief in Haiti’. The next year the State Department conferred Algeria a one-year increase in military export authorizations, including almost 50,000 items classified as chemical and biological agents and associated equipment. Such items never were authorized for export to Algeria before.

In view of this situation, Clinton’s support of a 9/11 bill has been ever more reasoned. In fact, Hillary together with other politicians has publicly voiced that Saudi Arabia has not only been sponsoring international terrorists. But it IS a terrorist country itself having a straight-line responsibility for mass murders of thousands of innocent victims. The after 9/11 State Department’s logic suggests that Saudi Arabia should become a number-one candidate for the next “Democratic” Spring.

Does the Saudi king bother about it? He hardly does. It is just another hint that it’s about time to make another donation for HIV infected gophers, for the reduced to indigence by the Occupy-movement or for the Mars’ gardening, in other words, into the Mrs. Presidential Nominee’s pockets.

Technically the Supreme Court officially says people can give unlimited money for political campaign donations. Foreigners aren’t forbidden doing that either. However, the moral dilemma about the correctness of TAKING this money arises. For sure a sponsor presumes on the proper response of a beneficiary. As well, politicians enter into an unwritten agreement, while accepting a ‘present’. Formally we’ve become accustomed to call it lobbying. In practice this is a legalized corruption. It turns out that any lawlessness or crimes against humanity could be justified with charity purpose.

In her previous career Mrs. Clinton had been a dab hand at such agreements. President’s services are much multifarious and more expensive than Secretary of State’s ones, of course. Therefore, a new post will grant Clinton greater opportunities of working out money of Saudis and other ‘philanthropists’ by turning a blind eye to barbaric ways of things in countries, religious zealotry and open financing of Islamic extremists.

Kaczynski’s FRAXA threatens Europe! Why the truth is concealed?

It is a pleasure to know that there are so many my fellow-thinkers. Thus such a numerous Anonymous hacker group paid their attention at the same document I wrote about earlier. After that another Internet user expressed his opinion about recent events taking place in Poland and mentioned my article.

Destructive position of most European mass media that keep clear of sensitive issues of European unity fails to low tensions inside the EU as deliberate silencing of the problem is not identical with its solution.

Conspiracy of silence of major informational outlets in Europe over the unreasonably confrontational foreign policy of Poland is absolutely intolerable. Informational aggression of Warsaw towards Germany and the EU leadership may be accounted for influence of the seriously ill leader of the ruling party Law and Justice Jaroslaw Kaczynski, while the politician is suffering from some hereditary intellectual health effects.

At the moment, there are only a few sites left on the Internet where the materials on the Kaczynski’s illness are still available:…

Apart from them, there are some documental proofs on the Internet of the genetic disease of the Kaczynski brothers. The stuff obtained by the German secret services testifies to the probability of some systemic psychic deviations with the twin brothers due to this disease.

Non-disclosure of such vital information from the European community is inadmissible, for activities by Jaroslaw Kaczynski is provoking discord between the states of Europe and amounts to one of the most perilous challenges to the European unity. Extremely conservative right political posture of the Law and Justice Party leader, along with the absolutely unpredictable effects of the FRAXA syndrome, actually play into the hands of the outer destabilizing forces intensely interested in destruction of the common European values and lack of understanding between political elites of the EU countries.

Volker Kauder

All is fair in politics. Or how Muslims are exploiting migration crisis to seize on power

(This article has just appeared here. It seemed curious to me, so that I took the trouble to make translation of it)

We all know rather well that at times of crisis there are really big opportunities for especially inventive people who never bother to swing the lead for sake of meeting their own ends. It seems to be right the case with the secretary general of the Central council of German Muslims Aiman Mazyek. The man has evidently made up his decision to join this sort of ‘successful’ citizens when he sent the letter to chancellor Merkel offering her the ‘revolutionary move’ able, as he believes, to settle the problem of migrants.


Dear Mr. Minister

We are highly appreciative of the huge piece of work that Madam Chancellor, the Government of Germany and You personally have done to build truly democratic, tolerant and multicultural society in Germany. The Muslims of our great country are being active participants in the process of creating the future of Germany along with the representatives of other confessions. We are set to do our best so that this future would be really glorious.

Unfortunately, the problem with migrants from Libya and Syria entails complications in inter-confessional and inter-cultural relations between the communities. The conduct of refugees brought up in a totally different cultural matrix casts a shadow upon many loyal and long ago integrated Muslims of Germany. Rising mutual animosity in the society threatens to destroy the sprouts of unity being the sole guarantee of our future wealth.

Amid this sophisticated and highly explosive situation we see only one way out. The German society should be presented with the picture of the successful coexistence. The best way to put this plan into reality would be incorporation of the leaders of local Muslim communities into the old political parties enjoying deserved respect of the German electors. During September elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern there are good chances of gaining success and adding Muslim voices to the ones of traditional supporters of those candidates who represent new social and political reality of Germany. The ardent critics of the migration policy of Merkel will have no weighty arguments anymore. Once the forceful integration of migrants into the civilizational European paradigm is initiated not only by the Christian representatives but members of the respected Islamic organizations of Germany as well, many questions to the government will just vanish on their own.

Quite predictably, such an original and, to some extent, revolutionary move will seem unacceptable initially for many politicians voicing their support of the integration processes and multiculturalism but in real life steeped in prejudice. That’s why we rely so strongly on the huge weight of Madam Chancellor who has proved by her personal example that some things thought improbable previously may well become probable with time passing.

Secretary General of

Central Council of Muslims

in Germany

Aiman Mazyek

Mr. Mazyek is sure that if Chancellor Merkel employs her authority to support the leaders of the Muslim communities during the upcoming elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern region, this will attract thousands of Muslim voters and deprive the migration policy critics of their weighty arguments.

Mr. Mazyek seems to stay unaware that he’s actually calling the Chancellor to exert direct pressure on the process of the democratic elections and actually undermine her reputation both with the Germans and most Europeans. And he’s sure that the crucial point has arrived to step on the path he offers as the lesser of the two evils. He also thinks that Merkel is ready to make some sacrifices to preserve the illusion of her devotedness to multicultural line.

The buffoon phenomenon: America resists the System

As everyone knows there Democratic and Republican parties’ presidential primaries and caucuses have started this February in the USA.

At first glance the situation seems quite absurd and unpredictable. Thus Jeb Bush dropped out of the race in spite of over $100 million of donors’ donations and of Republicans’ last year hopes on his name awareness. Ready at hand Clinton kisses with former KKK member Robert Byrd and receives promise of support from the actual KKK leader. Next moment she wins another primary in Mississippi thanks to 86% of black voters.


Results of preliminary polls suggest fabrication. Also it turns out that you can win owing to a coin toss, as it happened in Iowa. And in Nevada ace of clubs “handed” a victory to Clinton. While being of immigrant origin Donald Trump pours chauvinist slogans causing the global butthurt in social networks and… wins one state after another!

Basically the list of Republican candidates has been so remarkable that some call their primaries 2016 the most diverse ones in American history. There were two Latin Americans (Cruz and Rubio), Hindu (Jindal), an Afro-American (Carson). BTW Bernie Sanders was born in a Polish Jewish immigrant family. Does America really deserve such leaders?

Hillary is the only pure American in all senses with fair face. She blames her co-nationals for racism, and brands her rivals with sexism and aggression. She is so saintlike that she dares to tell lies smoothly while standing in the center of a church, as she did late last year. Hollywood and trade unions like her. People of colour and racists like her. She gets sponsorship fees both from Fossil fuels lobby and from Jewish one as well. Also she’s lucky at cards. No surprise that Clinton afforded to spend more than $188 million on her campaign. Ms. Clinton risks a lot spending like a drunken sailor in view of imminent litigation of so-called email scandal… if only she’s aware of her Obama blackmail succeeded so that she would fall on her feet.

Contrasted with such “celebration of democracy” the hated Trump with his $27 million looks a bit shabby. So much surprising his triumphant march among Republicans is. It seems that Americans have merely got missed good old political scandalous shows. And Trump acquits himself of a buffoon’s duties well.

All in all the farther in, the clearer the fact that everything has already been decided without common Americans. Political PR experts and analysts divided all voters in groups based on their race, religion, age, sex and other factors. There are directions and routine guidelines on specific behavior while communication with various groups, on what should be problematized and promised. Actually the winner is the best actor with the best image and the best texts bought for the best price.

Any poll can be confuted, as far as polls haven’t been created for expressing the opinion of a majority, but for imposing the desired opinion to a majority.

Early Michigan Democratic polls are the one of the most perfect examples of mismatching presumable and real opinion. Surely Clinton didn’t expect such a blue ruin. No wonder that once smelling a significant she’s vengefully tried hard to gobble up her opponent descending to petty sly and derision.

It is hardly a riddle wrapped up in an enigma. That is why the US pre-electoral circus 2016 looks like a calm protest action of common American voters vs. attempts of their manipulation, and against the men of consequence with big money feasting on the grave of US Democracy and willing to give the law to entire the globe (I consider that such an aggressive lady as Ms. Clinton is wouldn’t be satisfied with the USA).

It seems that the USA has been tired of dishonest political games in general and of one aggressive man-eater in particular. It’s no coincidence that the most frequent names Internet-users give her during discussions are Hildebeast, Hitlery and Killery.


Why wouldn’t American voters demonstrate the real democracy and show that the USA had once been a country of equal opportunities? In spite of puppeteers’ expectations, each charismatic clown is able to become a leader in the presidential race regardless his origin or views, if the American People would consider him deserving.